CIVE 633 - ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY

HYDRAULIC FOOD-CHAIN MODELS

Click -here- for printable copy.

  • Floodplain rivers are spatially, hydrologically and biologically complex.

  • Spatial heterogeneity and temporal fluctuations maintain the richness and complexity in ecosystems.

  • There is a need to understand the responses of river ecosystems to rearrangement by humans.

  • Tools are needed to predict the response of fishes and endangered species to hydrological manipulation.
HYDRAULIC FOOD-CHAIN MODELS

  • Hydraulic food-chain models predict the response of river biota to hydraulic parameters such as width, depth, and velocity.

  • Interaction between or among trophic levels is modulated by the flood pulse.

  • Four functional groups exist in a river ecosystem:

    • Detritus, comprising dead plant material, imported or local.

    • Vegetation, or living aquatic plants or algae.

    • Herbivores-detritivores, or grazers, which feed on vegetation and detritus.

    • Predators, large fish which consume animal prey.

  • Hydraulic food-chain models explore how the fundamental temporal and spatial features of floodplains influence the dynamics of the food chain.

HYDRAULIC RELATIONSHIPS

  • Consider three cases:

    • A natural river with access to its floodplain

    • A leveed river cutoff from its floodplain

    • A river with artificially stabilized flow which does not exceed the top of its bank (regulated upstream).

 

  • The hydraulic geometry of rivers has been described by Leopold and Maddock (at-a-station and downstream relations).

  • Equations for biomass dynamics of each of the four trophic elements are tied to channel hydraulics (width, depth and velocity).

  • Detritus increases as litter falls.

  • Detritus is lost to grazers at a rate determined by their densities (detritus and grazers).

  • Detritus diminishes as carbon is respired to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.

  • Outwash (outflow) is assumed to be equal to inwash (inflow).

  • Vegetation renews by logistic growth until it becomes self-limiting.

  • Vegetation that dies without being grazed increases the detritus.

  • Grazers convert vegetation or detritus into offsprings.

  • Grazers are killed by predators or die from other causes.

  • Predators suffer only non-predatory mortality.

  • Human fishing may add another trophic level.
LINKAGE OF HYDRAULIC AND TROPHIC DYNAMICS

  • One-dimensional model portrays large-river hydraulic and trophic dynamics at a single cross-section.

  • The model emphasizes temporal dynamics rather than spatial heterogeneity.

  • An overview of causal linkages is shown in Fig. 4.

  • Local geomorphology determines floodplain width.

  • Climate and land use (and geomorphology) govern discharge amount.

  • Width, depth, and velocity vary with discharge.

  • Width, depth amd velocity influence trophic dynamics by affecting key parameters in the biomass balance equations.

  • Table 1 shows biomass balance equations.

  • Mobile grazers and predators occupy the floodplain only when water is deeper than 0.2 m.

  • This depth has been found to be a critical threshold below which larger prey are vulnerable to fishing birds.

  • As hydrograph recedes, mobile grazers and predators return to the main channel except for that fraction left stranded in the flood plain.

  • Mortality from stranding can be high.

  • In the Parana river, Argentina, mortality by stranding is four times greater than fishing.

  • Trophic parameters can be linked to hydraulic parameters.

  • Loss rate of detritus decreases with increasing depth because water temperature and microbial concentrations decrease as depth increases.

  • Vegetation carrying capacity should decrease with depth if vegetation is light-limited.

  • Above a certain velocity, local growth is reduced by sloughing, or by light limitation if high flows are turbid.

  • Predator attack rates on grazers might decrease with velocity because of constraints on prey encounter or handling.

  • Prey refuges in the main channel can be dislodged by high flows.

  • Prey are washed away when flows exceed 2 m/s.

PRELIMINARY SIMULATIONS

  • Results from simulations are shown in Fig. 5.

  • The unmodified flood plain (a) maintains the most stable populations at higher trophic levels.

  • In the leveed channel (b), predators initially increase only to bust later to unsustainable feed rates.

  • In regulated channels with low flow (c), grazers thrive, but they are not able to sustain a viable predator population.

  • In regulated channels with average flow (d), flows are chronically too high for the nonhydrodynamic grazers to feed effectively, and they starve, following by the crash in their predator's population.

  • Simulations suggest that the longest food chains are maintained only when the environment fluctuates (the flood pulse).

  • Biota do not tract hydrologic cycles.

  • Longer, biologically driven cycles can be superimposed on the hydrologic cycle.

 

FUTURE NEEDS AND DIRECTIONS

  • There is a tendency for temporal and spatial variations to promote the persistence of longer food chains.

  • Large rivers are defined as "those large enough to intimidate research workers."

  • Levees or upstream regulation (dams) alter seasonal changes in discharge.

  • Ecological paradox of rivers: Large, frequent hydrologic perturbations are crucial for long-term maintenance of biodiversity, productivity, and the higher trophic levels, which are the most prized by humans.
 
041110