1. What is deep percolation in the context of L'vovich's water balance?
What is its value as a fraction of precipitation?
Why?
Explain the physical basis for this behavior.
Deep percolation is the fraction of precipitation that
reaches the groundwater but does not return eventually to the surface
waters as baseflow. Its ultimate destination is the oceans.
Its global value is less than 5%, with
an average of less than 2%. The value is a small fraction of
precipitation because the predominant direction of groundwater flow follows
a nearly horizontal gradient, to exit to the local/regional
baseflow of nearby streams and rivers.
2. Contrast the contributions of Dalton, Penman, Monteith and Shuttleworth-Wallace in evaporation modeling. Use a tabular form for the comparison.
Dalton | Penman | Monteith | Shuttleworth-Wallace |
Mass-transfer method only. | Combination method (mass transfer and energy balance). |
Physically-based combination method, featuring two resistances, external and internal. |
Physically-based combination method, featuring five resistances, accounting for plant canopy evaporation and the soil or water
in which they are growing. |
3. Explain the
controversy regarding how to account for
initial abstraction in the runoff curve number method,
as interpreted by hydrologic models in current use, such as
HEC-HMS and EPA SWMM.
How did Mockus propose to solve
the problem of quantifying the initial abstraction?
Mockus proposed to plot runoff vs effective precipitation, but was overruled by his superiors.
They zeroed on the initial abstraction as a constant fraction of precipitation, with the constant
set at λ = 0.2 from the beginning (1954).
Initially, the runoff curve number method was intended to be lumped in time.
i.e., for precipitation not to vary within the storm duration.
However, in practice, users have specified the initial abstraction
at the beginning of the storm
duration, effectively rendering it distributed in time.
Currently, there is no standard on how to temporally account
for initial abstraction.
4. Why is the Mockus approach to runoff generation, for the most part,
better than Horton's? Explain.
Mockus approach considers a finite depth of soil; on the other hand,
Horton's approach
assumes an infinite soil depth. Most locations have a finite soil depth;
thus, Mockus' apprcach works better in most practical situations.
5. Why
is the time of concentration calculated by the kinematic wave model likely to be
much less than that calculated with a storage concept or diffusion wave?
Explain the physical (mechanical) reason for this behavior.
Because the kinematic wave lacks diffusion and, consequently,
it does not spread (reduce) the flows.
Conversely, the diffusion wave has diffusion and, consequently, it spreads the flows in time and space.
The theoretical kinematic time of concentration
is exactly half of the theoretical time of concentration of the storage concept, which has
built-in diffusion.
6. (a) What is the mean albedo of the Earth's surface?
(b) Has it changed from ancient times to the present time?
How much, according to published studies?
(c) How does albedo vary from rain forests to deserts?
(d) Is it possible for humans to change the albedo of the ground surface? How?
(a) 0.154;
(b) Yes, it has increased, from 0.14 about 6000 years ago, to about 0.154 at the present time;
(c) Rainforests, 0.07-0.15; deserts, 0.20-0.45;
(d) Yes, by land use changes from forest,
to range, to agriculture, to urban; generally, by
an anthropogenic decrease in environmental moisture, in either soil or air.
|